Post Modernist Ipsum

The Stasis of Class: 

Capitalist rationalism and the post semiotic paradigm of context

Stu Pidaso

Department of Sociology, School of Modern Thinking, University of Western Topeka

1. Smith and deconstructivist dematerialism

“Sexuality is fundamentally a legal fiction,” says Debord. The subject is
interpolated into a postsemiotic paradigm of context that includes
consciousness as a paradox.

In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the concept of subtextual
sexuality. In a sense, Baudrillard uses the term ‘Debordist image’ to denote
not theory, as capitalist rationalism suggests, but posttheory. The
characteristic theme of Wilson’s[1] critique of Debordist
image is the role of the participant as reader.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of expression
that includes art as a whole. Baudrillard uses the term ‘capitalist
rationalism’ to denote a subtextual reality.

However, in All Tomorrow’s Parties, Gibson examines the postsemiotic
paradigm of context; in Idoru he affirms Sontagist camp. The primary
theme of the works of Gibson is the defining characteristic, and some would say
the economy, of capitalist sexual identity.

Thus, Baudrillard uses the term ‘the postsemiotic paradigm of context’ to
denote a mythopoetical paradox. Several discourses concerning not narrative,
but postnarrative exist.

2. Debordist image and subpatriarchial feminism

“Society is part of the collapse of language,” says Sartre; however,
according to Dahmus[2] , it is not so much society that is
part of the collapse of language, but rather the meaninglessness, and thus the
rubicon, of society. It could be said that the characteristic theme of
Hanfkopf’s[3] essay on the postsemiotic paradigm of context
is the dialectic, and subsequent meaninglessness, of neoconceptual narrativity.
Lacan uses the term ‘capitalist rationalism’ to denote a self-justifying
totality.

“Society is elitist,” says Lyotard. However, the main theme of the works of
Gibson is the common ground between sexuality and sexual identity. The failure
of subpatriarchial feminism which is a central theme of Gibson’s All
Tomorrow’s Parties emerges again in Idoru.

The characteristic theme of McElwaine’s[4] critique of
the postsemiotic paradigm of context is not construction, as Foucault would
have it, but preconstruction. In a sense, any number of narratives concerning
capitalist rationalism may be found. The subject is interpolated into a
subpatriarchial feminism that includes art as a reality.

If one examines the postsemiotic paradigm of context, one is faced with a
choice: either reject dialectic feminism or conclude that class has objective
value. But if capitalist rationalism holds, we have to choose between the
postsemiotic paradigm of context and Marxist capitalism. The subject is
contextualised into a capitalist rationalism that includes truth as a whole.

The primary theme of the works of Gibson is the role of the writer as poet.
However, many discourses concerning not, in fact, desublimation, but
postdesublimation exist. Subpatriarchial feminism suggests that expression must
come from the collective unconscious.

If one examines the postsemiotic paradigm of context, one is faced with a
choice: either accept subpatriarchial feminism or conclude that consciousness
may be used to entrench class divisions. Therefore, in Count Zero,
Gibson analyses the postsemiotic paradigm of context; in All Tomorrow’s
Parties, however, he affirms subcultural socialism. Sontag uses the term
‘capitalist rationalism’ to denote the role of the writer as observer.

Thus, Lacan promotes the use of the postsemiotic paradigm of context to
attack outdated perceptions of truth. Cameron[5] states that
the works of Gibson are postmodern.

But the main theme of Reicher’s[6] essay on the
structuralist paradigm of discourse is the difference between society and
sexual identity. Sartre uses the term ‘capitalist rationalism’ to denote the
role of the artist as reader.

Thus, Debord suggests the use of subpatriarchial feminism to modify class.
Several theories concerning the postsemiotic paradigm of context may be
discovered.

But the masculine/feminine distinction depicted in Gaiman’s Sandman
is also evident in Stardust, although in a more neodialectic sense. Many
narratives concerning not theory, but subtheory exist.

However, in Death: The Time of Your Life, Gaiman deconstructs
cultural narrative; in Neverwhere he examines capitalist rationalism. A
number of deappropriations concerning neodialectic nihilism may be found.

But the subject is interpolated into a capitalist rationalism that includes
narrativity as a paradox. Any number of discourses concerning the role of the
observer as reader exist.

Thus, the premise of the postsemiotic paradigm of context suggests that
narrative is a product of communication, but only if capitalist rationalism is
valid. A number of theories concerning subpatriarchial feminism may be
revealed.

It could be said that the premise of capitalist rationalism holds that the
significance of the observer is deconstruction. If subpatriarchial feminism
holds, we have to choose between the postsemiotic paradigm of context and
Lacanist obscurity.

3. Gaiman and capitalist rationalism

“Sexual identity is intrinsically a legal fiction,” says Debord; however,
according to Bailey[7] , it is not so much sexual identity
that is intrinsically a legal fiction, but rather the meaninglessness, and
eventually the collapse, of sexual identity. Therefore, Lyotard promotes the
use of subpatriarchial feminism to challenge sexism. An abundance of
deconstructions concerning not theory, but pretheory exist.

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction between
without and within. But Pickett[8] states that we have to
choose between the textual paradigm of expression and presemiotic capitalist
theory. The subject is contextualised into a postsemiotic paradigm of context
that includes language as a whole.

Thus, Derrida suggests the use of capitalist rationalism to read and modify
art. The characteristic theme of the works of Gaiman is the common ground
between society and class.

In a sense, several discourses concerning subpatriarchial feminism may be
found. Bataille’s analysis of the postsemiotic paradigm of context implies that
government is capable of significance.

Thus, the collapse, and hence the defining characteristic, of capitalist
rationalism prevalent in Gaiman’s Death: The High Cost of Living emerges
again in Black Orchid. If the postsemiotic paradigm of context holds, we
have to choose between substructural situationism and cultural discourse.

4. Subpatriarchial feminism and neoconceptualist theory

The primary theme of Tilton’s[9] critique of dialectic
subcultural theory is not discourse as such, but prediscourse. But a number of
narratives concerning a self-supporting totality exist. Lyotard promotes the
use of neoconceptualist theory to attack hierarchy.

If one examines textual theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject
neoconceptualist theory or conclude that the goal of the artist is significant
form. Therefore, any number of narratives concerning the postsemiotic paradigm
of context may be discovered. Debord suggests the use of the neostructuralist
paradigm of context to analyse sexuality.

“Class is part of the futility of art,” says Foucault. It could be said that
Sontag uses the term ‘the postsemiotic paradigm of context’ to denote the
bridge between society and sexual identity. The subject is interpolated into a
Batailleist `powerful communication’ that includes language as a whole.

Therefore, Sargeant[10] states that the works of Gaiman
are an example of textual feminism. If neoconceptualist theory holds, we have
to choose between prepatriarchialist objectivism and dialectic situationism.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a neoconceptualist theory that
includes narrativity as a reality. The example of capitalist rationalism
depicted in Gaiman’s The Books of Magic is also evident in Death: The
Time of Your Life, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

In a sense, Lyotard promotes the use of neoconceptualist theory to
deconstruct capitalism. The premise of capitalist rationalism implies that
culture is dead, given that language is equal to art.

But Dietrich[11] holds that we have to choose between
the postsemiotic paradigm of context and capitalist predialectic theory. Lacan
suggests the use of capitalist theory to modify and analyse consciousness.

5. Narratives of failure

“Society is part of the futility of culture,” says Foucault; however,
according to Brophy[12] , it is not so much society that is
part of the futility of culture, but rather the stasis, and subsequent rubicon,
of society. Thus, Sartre uses the term ‘neoconceptualist theory’ to denote not,
in fact, dematerialism, but postdematerialism. Lyotard’s analysis of the
postsemiotic paradigm of context implies that discourse comes from the
collective unconscious.

But Baudrillard uses the term ‘subconstructivist textual theory’ to denote
the futility, and thus the paradigm, of neomaterialist sexuality. The premise
of the postsemiotic paradigm of context holds that the raison d’etre of the
participant is deconstruction, but only if neoconceptualist theory is invalid;
otherwise, Sartre’s model of the postsemiotic paradigm of context is one of
“cultural sublimation”, and hence fundamentally a legal fiction.

In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is not
narrative, as Lacan would have it, but subnarrative. Lyotard uses the term ‘the
postcapitalist paradigm of consensus’ to denote a dialectic paradox.

It could be said that if capitalist rationalism holds, we have to choose
between submodernist materialism and textual libertarianism. The premise of the
postsemiotic paradigm of context implies that expression is created by
communication.

6. Rushdie and capitalist rationalism

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of
neoconceptual reality. However, Baudrillard uses the term ‘neoconceptualist
theory’ to denote not narrative, but subnarrative. Prinn[13] holds that we have to choose between capitalist
rationalism and textual discourse.

The primary theme of Geoffrey’s[14] critique of the
postsemiotic paradigm of context is the genre, and subsequent dialectic, of
subtextual sexual identity. Thus, capitalist rationalism suggests that class,
perhaps surprisingly, has intrinsic meaning, given that culture is
interchangeable with consciousness. If dialectic postdeconstructivist theory
holds, the works of Rushdie are not postmodern.

But a number of sublimations concerning a self-referential reality exist.
The figure/ground distinction intrinsic to Rushdie’s The Moor’s Last
Sigh emerges again in Midnight’s Children.

It could be said that Derrida promotes the use of the postsemiotic paradigm
of context to challenge elitist perceptions of art. Parry[15] states that we have to choose between neoconceptualist
theory and the neodialectic paradigm of reality.

Therefore, Sartre suggests the use of conceptual poststructuralist theory to
read society. The premise of capitalist rationalism holds that sexuality serves
to marginalize the proletariat.

---

1. Wilson, C. I. ed. (1984) The
postsemiotic paradigm of context in the works of Gibson. Oxford University
Press

2. Dahmus, U. B. S. (1999) Discourses of Defining
characteristic: The postsemiotic paradigm of context and capitalist
rationalism. University of Massachusetts Press

3. Hanfkopf, P. ed. (1978) Capitalist rationalism and the
postsemiotic paradigm of context. Panic Button Books

4. McElwaine, E. S. (1984) The Stone Key: Capitalist
rationalism in the works of Rushdie. University of Southern North Dakota at
Hoople Press

5. Cameron, K. B. Z. ed. (1996) Capitalist rationalism in
the works of Eco. And/Or Press

6. Reicher, H. V. (1982) Realities of Collapse: The
postsemiotic paradigm of context in the works of Gaiman. Panic Button
Books

7. Bailey, N. ed. (1995) The postsemiotic paradigm of
context and capitalist rationalism. Harvard University Press

8. Pickett, W. P. (1971) The Discourse of Genre:
Capitalist rationalism and the postsemiotic paradigm of context. University
of Massachusetts Press

9. Tilton, Z. ed. (1990) Capitalist rationalism in the
works of Cage. O’Reilly & Associates

10. Sargeant, U. J. A. (1978) Dialectic Constructions:
Subcapitalist desublimation, socialism and capitalist rationalism. Oxford
University Press

11. Dietrich, L. ed. (1989) The postsemiotic paradigm of
context and capitalist rationalism. University of California Press

12. Brophy, N. R. B. (1973) The Meaninglessness of
Reality: Capitalist rationalism in the works of Rushdie. And/Or
Press

13. Prinn, S. I. ed. (1981) Capitalist rationalism and
the postsemiotic paradigm of context. University of Southern North Dakota
at Hoople Press

14. Geoffrey, U. E. L. (1998) Postcultural
Deappropriations: The postsemiotic paradigm of context and capitalist
rationalism. Loompanics

15. Parry, R. ed. (1989) Capitalist rationalism and the
postsemiotic paradigm of context. University of Illinois Press